Blood Ties sets up crucial plot and thematic points for
the finale. Like the show generally, it uses the real life experiences of
teenagers via metaphor. Thus Dawn, like many 14 year olds, perhaps particularly
those who are adopted, feels alienated from her family and “not real”. She cuts
herself because she’s come to doubt her own reality: “Am I real?”. In this
case, the “real” experiences become a metaphor for the “reality” of the plot
line – Dawn’s sense of alienation upon learning that she’s the Key. In my view,
Dawn’s role as metaphor as well as character means that her sense that she’s
“not real” is telling us something important about Buffy. I’ll leave that
cryptic for now, but this dialogue seems relevant to me:
BUFFY: It's not that simple! We're not gonna be able to fix this with a
hug and a kiss and a bowl of soup! Dawn needs to know where she came from, she
needs real answers.
JOYCE: (sits) What she needs is her sister, Buffy, not the Slayer.
JOYCE: (sits) What she needs is her sister, Buffy, not the Slayer.
In the end, Buffy assures Dawn that she is indeed real, and again it’s
metaphorical: “It’s Summers’ blood.”
The Knights were chanting “The Key is the link. The link must be
severed.” Well, we know that Dawn is the Key, so she’s the reference here,
although the Knights don’t seem to know she is. Since she’s the Key, she must
therefore be the link. The question is, what two things does she link? And why,
from the perspective of the Knights, must that link be severed? The answers to
these questions are related to Dawn’s reality and metaphorical role.
The obvious question to ask is whether the Knights of Byzantium
themselves serve a metaphorical purpose. I’m not entirely certain, but my best
guess is that they’re simply a fairly obvious reference to the militant
Christian orders of the Middle Ages like the Knights Templar.
Their determination to “sever” the Key is, in this reading, a reference to the
way religion demands sacrifices of those things which are most precious, as
well as a reminder of the paternalism of that worldview.
In my post on The Replacement,
I said that the themes of the season had been established. Blood Ties is the first episode to reveal a part of one theme.
Prior to this episode we knew there was some connection between Ben and Glory.
We now learn that they morph into each other. This explains Ben’s confidence in
Listening to Fear, that Glory can’t
harm him. But it also brings us back to The
Replacement, which, it now becomes clear, was telling us something
important about the season arc. In that episode, Xander learned that he needed
all aspects of his personality in order to “be” Xander. We now see that Buffy’s
foe for the season is someone who seems to have separate and distinct personalities
also – one’s a normal human being, the other’s super powerful and not entirely
sane. I’ll have more to say on this topic when we get to Intervention and The Gift.
Trivia notes: (1) There’s a very subtle moment in the teaser which sets
up what will happen in the episode Tough
Love. (2) Spike’s candy box was wrecked because he used it to hit the Buffy
mannequin in Triangle. (3) Spike
suggested that Dawn watch Teletubbies, which was a children’s TV show. (4) Spike
compared Dawn to Little Red Riding Hood because a big bad wolf might get her on her
way to the Magic Shop. (5) Dawn’s flashbacks in the Magic Shop are, in order,
to Listening to Fear, Real Me, and Shadow. (6) Xander described Glory has having a “jones” for the
Key. “Jones” is a slang term meaning strong desire or craving. (7) Glory
described Ben as “gentle Ben” which was the title of a TV show and movie about
a bear. There was a previous reference to the show in Pangs. (8) Buffy suggested looking at the carousel because that’s
where Riley and Dawn went in Shadow.
Also, Buffy presumably has the false memories of Dawn’s birthday party there
which Dawn described to Riley. (9) Glory wanted Dawn to “start singin”, which
is American slang for “start talking”. (10) Glory used the expression “fox in
my henhouse”, a slang expression which means that the wrong person has been
allowed into something (foxes obviously being bad news for chickens). (11) The
Latin word Willow used for her spell, “discede”, means “disperse” or
“separate”. (12) Buffy’s mention of Dawn having a get-out-of-jail-free card
comes from the game Monopoly.
These are all SPOILERY, but that seems impossible to avoid, as this episode is so imbricated in major themes and events...
ReplyDeleteSLIGHT SPOILER THROUGH THE LATER PARTS OF SEASON 6
This episode begins Dawn’s special relationship with Spike. I don’t think it is an accident that it starts with Dawn’s discovery of her origin, because it seems to be grounded, in part, at the beginning, in their shared struggles with their humanity: Dawn’s doubt of her’s, Spike’s groping for his—and it develops further out of Spike’s sense of responsibility for Dawn, something that plays a partial role in his becoming-becoming-human, if we can call it that.
SPOILERS
I agree that the Knights of B function as a reminder of a paternalistic worldview, but I do not think that they simply point to religion: it is no coincidence that they appear during the Council’s episode, just before Giles is re-instated—for they serve, I think, as an extreme point against which to measure the actions of the other characters. At one end is Buffy’s recognition of Dawn’s humanity, at the other, the Order’s refusal to see anything but her purpose—and in between is Giles, who has “sworn,” as a member of the Council, “to protect this sorry world”—a vow not unlike the Order’s—and who is willing to kill Dawn, although he seeks to find another way and acknowledges, as Gregor, in Spiral, does not, Dawn’s humanity. This spectrum also reminds us of the paternalism of the Council, of which Giles is still a part, despite his resistance to its grosser strictures, and the degree to which he still adheres to its fundamental precepts—an adherence that will allow him to kill Ben, an act of which Buffy would be incapable.*
*In LMPTM, Buffy admits that she would now let Dawn die—and by implication, I think this means that she would kill Ben as well—but I see this as a statement she makes at the height of her paternalistic-general phase (ironically, the moment at which she rejects Giles as having taught her “all [she] need[s] to know”), not the final state she will reach.
Small Question
Has there been discussion of why the Monks made the key into Dawn, so that the Slayer would protect it—keep it in existence/alive—rather than destroying it? I understand what Dawn means for Buffy, but why were they “fools,” to use Gregor’s terms, to put the world at risk? I have some ideas, but I was wondering if this has been debated. If you are going to cover this in the finale, let me know, and I shall wait.
SPOILERS
DeleteThere's a line of dialogue somewhere... possibly not from the show but instead in a fanfic I read. Anyways I have vague memory of an implication that the monks made the key human in order to maintain control over its power. If they destroyed it, the power would be lost to the world.
Since the key is ancient, and the order of monks protecting it doesn't seem to be a recent addition to its history, then the question could be extended to why the key was even allowed to exist as mystical energy for all these years, given the threat it posed to the world.
SPOILERS THROUGH SPIRAL
DeleteI think this is the passage you meant:
BUFFY: Why didn't they just destroy it? If the key is as dangerous as-
GREGOR: Because they were fools. They thought they could harness its power for the forces of light.
Probably years too late to comment. I wanted to make the same comment about your Fool for Love review but I might as well do it here.
DeleteI'm not sure if the relationship between Dawn and Spike is really based on the same learning curve on understanding what it means to be human. They are not in the same situation at all. Actually, I think that if Spike is with Dawn in this episode it is within what I believe to be one of his roles in the series; Spike is a "revealer" of truths. He is either there when truths are revealed, like in season 2 when Buffy tells Joyce about her being the Slayer or in this episode where he even takes the book from Dawn to read the last important bit. He also reveals the truths by his words to both Buffy and us, like in Lover's walk (whether you agree or not on his description of love, he is true when he says Angel and Buffy are not friends) or in Fool for Love (on the death wish) - or by his actions (still Lover's walk for Xander and Willow's affair, or season 6 on Buffy). He also reveals a lot on other characters by contrast and comparison(of course Angel, but also in season 7).
Even if (as you said) they're not in the same situation, they both feel "not a part" of the Scooby circle in any meaningful way. But since they are purposefully not kept in the Scooby support structure, it really shouldn't be a surprise that they seek each other out - and of course, Spike knows that if he keeps Dawnie safe, he'll be earning teeny, tiny points with Buffy. They will add up.
DeleteNice tie-in between Dawn and Spike. I completely agree with your second point, including the note.
ReplyDeleteI don't recall much discussion about the Monks' actions. I don't have anything planned on that topic as of now. Of course, now that you've got me thinking about it.... :)
I always love reading your thoughts on these episodes! It's really fun to rewatch Season 5 because the foreshadowing and metaphors are handled so well.
ReplyDeleteSpike casting Dawn as Red Riding Hood seems especially appropriate given the same reference was used for Buffy in Helpless.
Thank you. And another good spot.
Delete