I want to begin this post with a
brief digression into the Hero’s
Journey. While Buffy’s been on a “hero’s journey” since S1, I decided that
any mention of that before After Life
would spoil new viewers about Buffy’s death and resurrection. I think the steps
on the Journey from here on out are sufficiently vague that I can talk about
them without spoiling anyone.
You can see more at the link, but I’ll walk through a brief explanation of the Hero’s Journey here. Joseph Campbell developed the idea of what he called a “monomyth”. Campbell argued that most myths and legends follow a similar outline. He arrived at his classification from theory based in Jungian psychology. I don’t want to get sidetracked with debates about that, so my description of Campbell’s work will be entirely pragmatic.
You can see more at the link, but I’ll walk through a brief explanation of the Hero’s Journey here. Joseph Campbell developed the idea of what he called a “monomyth”. Campbell argued that most myths and legends follow a similar outline. He arrived at his classification from theory based in Jungian psychology. I don’t want to get sidetracked with debates about that, so my description of Campbell’s work will be entirely pragmatic.
What Campbell did was compare
various myths and legends across cultures and down the ages. He found that he
was able to define similar elements in most, if not all of them. It’s important
not to interpret “similar” as “identical”. He didn’t mean that all myths are
identical in form or content. Nor did he mean that the creators worked off of a
common prompt. The stages he identified might happen in different order in
different myths; some myths might leave out a stage altogether. But in general, any story of a hero was
likely to incorporate certain basic ideas.
Buffy’s journey is the journey of
a Hero – “she’s a Hero, you see” – so I’ll give a quick example of how hers can
fit into Campbell’s structure. The first stage of the journey is the Call to
Adventure. We see this in the very first episode, when Giles calls her to her
Slayer destiny (with a little fudge to account for the movie):
“Buffy: Oh, why can't you people just leave me alone?
Giles: Because you are the Slayer. Into each
generation a Slayer is born, one girl in all the world, a Chosen One, one born
with the strength and skill to hunt the vampires…”
The Hero refuses the Call, which
Buffy certainly did in Welcome to the
Hellmouth, and perhaps (as I argue) during all of S1. In order to answer
the Call, the Hero gets supernatural aid, which Angel delivers to her in WttH in the form of a cross. As I
mentioned in notes to that first episode essay, Angel’s name comes from the Greek
word meaning “messenger” and the supernatural implications of that name in this
context are fairly blatant.
After a variety of additional
stages, we get to the stage of Apotheosis, a Greek word which means literally
“near God”. This usually involves the death of the Hero, hence my postponing of
the topic until this episode. Quoting from Wikipedia (all quotes from the link
above), “When someone dies a physical death, or dies to the self to live in
spirit, he or she moves beyond the pairs of opposites to a state of divine
knowledge, love, compassion and bliss. A more mundane way of looking at this
step is that it is a period of rest, peace and fulfillment before the hero
begins the return.”
When we learned at the end of After Life that Buffy had been pulled
out of heaven, that established that she was in the “period of rest, peace and
fulfillment before the hero begins the return.”
The next two stages consist of
the Ultimate Boon and the Refusal of the Return. I mention these stages for the
obvious reason that I believe they describe the events of S6 and S7, though in
reverse order. Keep them in mind as we watch:
“The ultimate boon is the
achievement of the goal of the quest. It is what the person went on the journey
to get. All the previous steps serve to prepare and purify the person for this
step, since in many myths the boon is something transcendent like the elixir of
life itself, or a plant that supplies immortality, or the holy grail.”
The receipt of the “Ultimate
Boon” helps explain the Christ imagery we saw in The Gift. Buffy’s bringing something back with her, something of
value to the world, whether she knows it or not. She began her journey to
adulthood on her own behalf, but now there’s more at stake.
Before we get there, though, the
Hero must be reluctant to return to the world: “Having found bliss and
enlightenment in the other world, the hero may not want to return to the
ordinary world to bestow the boon onto his fellow man.”
Note that the “refusal of the
return” fits in smoothly with the “stages of grief” metaphor introduced in Bargaining. After
Life serves as the third part of a trilogy with Bargaining 1 and 2, or perhaps a coda to them. In After Life we learn that Buffy isn’t
grieving because of impending death, she’s grieving at the loss of her time in
heaven. She didn’t ask to return and doesn’t want to. Think about it this way:
Buffy gained entry to heaven partly because of the way she lived her life and
partly as a result of a moment of grace when she sacrificed herself for her
sister. She has no guarantee that she’ll have access to that in the future. No
wonder she appears so different to her friends.
Buffy’s reaction isn’t just
important to this one episode. The same rule holds true in S6 as in all
previous seasons, namely the first three episodes set the themes for the
season. Some of those themes are relatively obvious, such as the stages of
grief metaphor, the Hero’s Journey sequence, the issue of how Buffy handles her
return, and the impact of the events of Bargaining
on both her and on her friends. All these appear in the opening trilogy and set
the template for S6.
Let’s put some of this in terms
of the metaphor of adulthood. One way to interpret what was meant by “bargaining”
is that Buffy wants to postpone or delay her adulthood. If I could just have
more time….
We now learn that Buffy has been
torn out of heaven by her friends. Consistent with what I said about Buffy
reaching adulthood in The Gift, IMO
what Buffy experienced and has now lost is the sense of euphoria which comes
when we first realize that we’ve made it all the way to adulthood, though we
can also see it as a period of nostalgia for the childhood she’s left behind: “I was happy. At peace. I knew that everyone
I cared about was all right. I knew it. Time ... didn't mean anything ...
nothing had form ... but I was still me, you know? And I was warm ... and I was
loved ... and I was finished. Complete.” It was the period of rest, peace, and
fulfillment before beginning her Return.
We need to imagine how the Hero
feels on reaching this point: Success! Completion! Then she’s snapped back to
reality, just like the rest of us are when we reach adulthood. It’s depressing
when we realize that adulthood is actually hard. She’s now feeling as if she
was ripped out of childhood prematurely (hence my quote at the top of the essay).
The title of the episode
reinforces this. “After Life” seems
like a play on “afterbirth” (though there are multiple meanings to the title,
as usual). Taking it this way, Buffy has been reborn as an adult after her life
as a child.
The demon – also an “afterbirth”
of sorts – I see as a metaphor which could be interpreted a couple of different
ways. My preferred reading is that it represents Buffy’s anger, even rage, at
the way her friends pulled her back into the responsibilities of adulthood.
That’s evident when Buffy sees the pictures of her friends turn to corpses. The
demon’s words express that anger, first at her friends:
BUFFY (possessed by the demon):
(low hoarse voice) What did you do? Do you know what you did? You're like
children. (Willow and Tara sitting up in bed staring in fear) Your hands smell
of death. Bitches! Filthy little bitches, rattling the bones. Did you cut the
throat? Did you pat its head?
Buffy grabs a crystal ball off a
nearby table and throws it at them. Willow and Tara shriek as it smashes on the
wall above their heads.
BUFFY: (shouts) The blood dried
on your hands, didn't it?
TARA: Oh my god, oh my god.
BUFFY: (shouts) You were stained.
You still are. I know what you did! …
DAWN: (low hoarse voice) All of
you did it. You stupid children. (the others all staring at her) Did you think
the blood wouldn't reach you? I smell the death on you. Look at what you've
done!”
Then it turns on Buffy:
DEMON: (whispery voice) You don't
belong here.
DEMON: (O.S.) Did they tell you,
you belonged here?
DEMON: Did they say this was your
home again?
DEMON: Were you offered pretty
lies, little girl?
DEMON: Or did they even give you
a choice?
DEMON: You're the one who's
barely here. Set on this earth like a bubble.
The nature of the demon, I think,
reinforces its role as metaphorical anger. It’s temporary and will dissipate in
time, just as anger does, unless we give it substance. Buffy’s struggling with
her anger when Willow’s spell causes that anger to manifest. That allows Buffy
to choke off her anger by beheading the demon, but the unfortunate consequence
is that this metaphorically prevents Buffy’s anger from fading away. We could
see the beheading of the demon as preventing Buffy from being destroyed by her
anger, but it also means cutting off the catharsis that rage might have
provided.
Buffy then does in “real life”
what she just did in metaphor – she represses her anger by thanking her friends
for bringing her back, telling them pretty lies in the process.
When Dawn tells Buffy that the
others “just want to see you happy”, Buffy reacts entirely in character: she
sacrifices her own feelings for the sake of her friends. It’s incredibly
painful. She thought she had made one last sacrifice, but it turns out that
life continues to demand more.
Willow continues to hide the
details of her spell even from Tara, denying that she understood what the
“hitchhiker” said about the spell even as those words described what Willow did
with the fawn. Her eyes turned black again when she – not Tara, just Willow –
made the demon solid. Not good.
Spike’s angry comment about magic
– “there’s always consequences” – seems to refer not to the potential that a
spell will go wrong, but to things which happen outside the spell itself, what
we might call collateral consequences. Is Spike’s statement consistent with
what we’ve seen to date in the show? Not as far as I’m concerned. The only
example of “collateral consequences” before this episode was in Superstar (and, arguably, Restless or, very indirectly, Becoming 2).
Marti Noxon said that “On Buffy,
we play with the idea of witchcraft or magic, and it’s always about the
intention of the person who uses it. Magic per se is not a bad thing. What they
do with it is either going to be good or bad.” This strikes me as inconsistent
with Spike’s statement, since his word “always” is obviously wrong given what
Marti said.
That’s a nitpick at this point.
For me, the episode is made in two scenes: “every night I save you”; and the
ending with Spike and Buffy. Both are heartbreaking.
Trivia notes: (1) The Mercurochrome
Spike wanted to use on Buffy’s hands is an old antiseptic no longer sold in most
countries because it contains mercury. (2) Spike’s concern that Buffy might
come back wrong no doubt arises from his experience with Doc in Forever, when Doc warned of that
possibility. (3) Angel was feral in Beauty
and the Beasts. Willow remembers that and uses it to justify Buffy’s
behavior to Tara. (4) “Thaumogenesis” is a portmanteau word meaning
“originating in magic”. (5) Buffy’s “Those of us who fail history? Doomed to
repeat it in summer school” plays off the aphorism by George Santayana that
“those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it.”
The next few weeks I have a great deal of RL things to attend to, and s6 has a habit of overtaking my thoughts when I start going, so I probably won't comment for the next few posts. That said, I am enjoying your take so far and your last few posts have been characteristically great. I hope to get back and comment on The Gift, Bargaining and this one in time because I do have some thoughts on all three, but alas.
ReplyDeleteYou know, you should never let stuff like that interfere with the really important things in life like Buffy. :)
DeleteThanks.
I know! My lack of priorities is astonishing. :) Somehow it seems appropriate that real life is taking over as my Big Bad (well, Big Medium really) for me when you get to s6. Anyway, will be back.
DeleteYou and your brains are being missed at Noel's review of "Objects in Space" today over at AV Club, to explain existentialism.
ReplyDeleteI'd forgotten he was on that episode today. I'll go check it out.
Delete"Buffy reacts entirely in character: she sacrifices her own feelings for the sake of her friends."
ReplyDeleteAs you also point out she does in "Dead Man's Party". I hadn't noticed the parallels until finally beginning to read your season 3 posts.
JEL
Buffy's fear of isolation, of losing all her friends, is a powerful motivator for her:
DeleteGiles: A, a Slayer slays, a Watcher...
Buffy: ...watches?
Giles: Yes. No! (sets down the books) He, he trains her, he, he, he prepares her...
Buffy: Prepares me for what? For getting kicked out of school? For losing all of my friends? (WTTH)
I'll be interested in your take on the S3 posts.
Not to be overly nitpicky, but "Something Blue" is another example of magic having consequences. As is "Doppelgangland", although Spike was not there to witness it.
ReplyDeleteGreat article, though.
Thanks.
DeleteI didn't treat either of those episodes as involving "collateral" consequences because in each case the result directly followed from the spell. The caster -- Willow, Anya -- just didn't realize how the spell worked.
Something I have not seen commented before on this episode, and which bugged me back then (eish, you know us, non-religious people) was the reference to heaven. And yes, I know they speak of hell before but it was more like parallel words, no?
ReplyDeleteNow that I have read your philosophical take on seasons 2 and 3, don't you feel the show is slightly contradictory here? I'm eager to know how do you explain 'After life' 's revelation and its potential consequences on buffyverse's messages? If there is an heaven after death, then that should give meaning to life and it cancels what they were saying before on 'absurdism' and choices - no?
The only reason it didn't bug me too long and that I enjoyed season 6 a lot is that they brilliantly flipped the traditional image of heaven, as a peaceful place which we can all tend to go after life, with a memory actually haunting Buffy. The show is still subversive but anyway, yes I'd like to know your take on this.
I see it like the soul canon: you can't be a consistent existentialist in a world with souls and heaven (though they're suitably vague on what makes it a "heaven"). I don't have a problem with it because I think Joss is letting his philosophy influence the story, but not control it. He can get across important points -- choice, responsibility -- without sacrificing the story. That's ok with me; as I said in the essay on Amends, he's a storyteller, not a philosopher.
DeleteStill reading, here in 2020, along with my rewatch. What struck me here is that although 'magic has consequences' (the only real rule magic has in the Buffy verse), which we think we see resolved in this episode, we actually see the consequences played out as the defining conflict of the season. The hitchhiker is a misdirect.
ReplyDeleteHow can you mention 'every night I save you' and not Spike's first sight of Buffy on the stairs?! JM's face-acting steals every scene in the series, and this is his best work along with the deck scene in FFL and 'come in, Spike' in The Gift.
Still read your blog after every episode. Hope you're well.
Marsters' facial expressions are usually incredible. I agree though that this is one of his best moments.
ReplyDeleteYes, absolutely the hitchhiker was a misdirect. It really set us up to be shocked later.
I am well, thanks, and I hope you are too. Glad to hear you're still reading. More comments are always appreciated.