As should be obvious by now, the writers
depended on the viewers having an obsessive memory for the details of previous
episodes. By S7 there are numerous references to earlier seasons in each
episode, and the whole plot line of S7 depends on everyone remembering the
events of Amends. Bring on the Night contains a number of
scenes which follow from Amends, and
if you haven’t re-watched Amends in
some time it’s probably helpful to do that now.
In Amends
the First tried to get Angel kill himself (among other things). Here we see it
work on both Willow and Spike, in addition to using the Ubervamp against Buffy.
I’ll talk first about Willow and Spike, because what happens with them reminds
us of what happened to Angel and thus what the First is. With that in mind,
I’ll turn to the main plot of Buffy and the Potentials.
When the First takes over Willow’s spell, her fear afterwards – “It's still in me. I feel it!” – can be read both as metaphor and as consequence. Willow still fears the potential evil inside her and that fear prevents her from using her full abilities.
When the First takes over Willow’s spell, her fear afterwards – “It's still in me. I feel it!” – can be read both as metaphor and as consequence. Willow still fears the potential evil inside her and that fear prevents her from using her full abilities.
In storyline terms, Spike’s torture in BotN seems odd. Why not just dust him?
As I see it, the physical torture is designed to weaken his mental resistance
so that the seductions of the First can take hold again.
Metaphorically, Spike’s torment, like
Willow’s fear from her spell, represents his punishment of himself for his
recent “binge”. The punishment is mental as well as physical. The First tells
Spike how awful he is, how worthless, just as Jenny’s ghost told Angel in Amends. That’s what the First is – it’s your own fears, insecurities, isolation,
and existential despair telling you that you will fail, that you’re worthless,
that you should murder your best friend, that Annabelle should run away, that
you can’t win the game.
It’s Buffy’s faith in Spike – the belief that
he is not alone – which gives him the
strength to overcome the torments of the First (storyline) and his own
recriminations (metaphor):
DRUSILLA/FIRST
Do you know why you're alive?
Do you know why you're alive?
SPIKE
(weakly) Never figured you for existential thought, luv. I mean, you hatedParis .
(weakly) Never figured you for existential thought, luv. I mean, you hated
DRUSILLA/FIRST
You're alive for one reason, and one reason only. Because I wish it. Do you know why I wish it? (holds her hands to her heart) Because I'm not done with you.
You're alive for one reason, and one reason only. Because I wish it. Do you know why I wish it? (holds her hands to her heart) Because I'm not done with you.
SPIKE
(scoffs) Give it up. (Drusilla/First rolls her eyes and turns away) Whatever you are, whatever you get away with, I'm out. You can't pull this puppet's strings anymore.
(scoffs) Give it up. (Drusilla/First rolls her eyes and turns away) Whatever you are, whatever you get away with, I'm out. You can't pull this puppet's strings anymore.
DRUSILLA/FIRST
(snaps back to face Spike) And what makes you think you have a choice? What makes you think you will ever be any good at all in this world?
(snaps back to face Spike) And what makes you think you have a choice? What makes you think you will ever be any good at all in this world?
SPIKE
She does. Because she believes in me.
She does. Because she believes in me.
Spike can believe in himself because Buffy
believes in him. “I mean, the whole show in a way, the whole show ping pongs
between the darkest night of the soul and this whole yearning for belief.”
Marti Noxon.
I doubt Spike’s mention of existentialism is
accidental.
I think Juliet Landau did a great job. She
had to play someone else playing Drusilla. That meant she had to be similar to
Drusilla without actually being her
(Spike: “You’re not Drusilla.”). That’s hard to do and she did it very well.
While Willow and Spike are important for
showing us how the First works, they are secondary to the plot of this episode.
BotN introduces us to the first
Potentials, or “slayers in training” as they’re sometimes called. Their
presence explains the young women we saw murdered in Lessons, Beneath You, and
Sleeper. We’ll see more Potentials as
we go along. The Potentials were widely unpopular as a group and often
individually unpopular as well. I personally don’t have any problem with them per se, though individuals among them
will sometimes annoy me.
Regardless of your own reaction, the
important point to remember is that the Potentials play a crucial metaphorical
role in the season. We’ll be told that metaphor two episodes hence, so I’ll
hold off discussing it until then. For now I’ll just say that what they’re
crucial for is the solution to the problem pointed out to Buffy by “Joyce”
(it’s really the First; Jane Espenson had to assure everyone because viewers
were so confused – see trivia note 2) in her second appearance:
JOYCE
Buffy, evil isn't coming, it's already here. Evil is always here. Don't you know? It's everywhere.
Buffy, evil isn't coming, it's already here. Evil is always here. Don't you know? It's everywhere.
BUFFY
And I have to stop it.
And I have to stop it.
JOYCE
How are you gonna do that?
How are you gonna do that?
BUFFY
I-I don't know yet, but—
I-I don't know yet, but—
JOYCE
Buffy, no matter what your friends expect of you, evil is a part of us. All of us. It's natural. And no one can stop that. No one can stop nature, not even—
Buffy, no matter what your friends expect of you, evil is a part of us. All of us. It's natural. And no one can stop that. No one can stop nature, not even—
Note that this is essentially the same
problem the real Joyce pointed out to Buffy in Gingerbread. There’s a very good reason for all these S3
references, which I’ll explain in the finale.
Right now, all we know is that the Potentials
are in danger. The First intends to terminate the Slayer line:
GILES
…We always feared that this day would come, when there'd be an attack against not just an individual slayer, but against the whole line….
…We always feared that this day would come, when there'd be an attack against not just an individual slayer, but against the whole line….
BUFFY
The First. That's what it wants.
The First. That's what it wants.
GILES
Yes, to erase all the slayers in training and their watchers along with their methods.
Yes, to erase all the slayers in training and their watchers along with their methods.
BUFFY
And then Faith, and then me. And with all the potentials gone and no way of making another, it's the end. No more slayer. Ever.
And then Faith, and then me. And with all the potentials gone and no way of making another, it's the end. No more slayer. Ever.
Buffy describes the slayer line as running
through the Potentials, then Faith, then her. That’s wrong in light of Joss’s
official explanation after S5 that the Slayer line now runs through Faith, and
it bothers a lot of viewers. I don’t really see it as much of a problem, just a
case of Buffy being wrong. As we saw in CWDP,
Buffy’s own life has been dramatically affected by her role as “the” Slayer, so
it’s understandable that she’d see it that way. Her view is consistent with the
season theme, but I’ll leave it there to avoid spoilers.
The scene where she escapes the Ubervamp in
the first encounter nicely recapitulates the scene in which she and Xander
escaped the vamps in The Harvest.
It’s another “back to the beginning” reference, but I also see it as a
“starting over” theme. She faced the challenge once when she was young, now she
faces a similar but more difficult challenge as an adult. We’re supposed to
compare and contrast how she deals with the new challenge.
Giles is the one who sets her that challenge.
Since Giles’ role in S7 gets a lot of criticism, I might as well say up front
that I think the writers perfectly capture a parent whose daughter has grown up
but who still wants to pressure her to act like the parent thinks she should.
Giles, it’s clear, remains Ripper at heart, willing to do what he believes is
necessary regardless of moral concerns, as we see from him stealing the
Council’s books because “there wasn't time for-for bureaucracy or debate”.
Giles is seriously frightened by the
destruction of an institution which has dominated his life, and we can see that
fright in his words to Buffy: “If the slayer line is eliminated, then the
hellmouth has no guardian. The balance is destroyed. I'm afraid it falls to
you, Buffy. Sorry. I mean, we'll do what we can, but you're the only one who
has the strength to protect these girls—and the world—against what's coming.”
What Giles says is perfectly logical (Giles =
mind), even inevitable, given what he knows, indeed, what we all know. Faith
aside because she’s in prison, the situation is now as it was in Welcome to the Hellmouth when Giles
explained to Buffy why she had to accept her duty as the Slayer in essentially
the same words: “Because you are the Slayer. Into each generation a Slayer is
born, one girl in all the world, a Chosen One….” Every single episode in S1
repeated this point in the introduction: “In every generation there is a Chosen
One. She alone will stand against the vampires, the demons and the forces of
darkness. She is the Slayer.”
Buffy’s role as the Slayer means that she
must necessarily end up in charge. I’ve discussed that consequence previously,
most notably in connection with Xander’s Lie in Becoming, and it’s directly related to the season 7 themes. Think
of it this way: Because she’s the Slayer, only she can be the General. That’s
been true since I pointed it out in my post on Becoming, since Jane Espenson said it on the DVD commentary to Earshot, and since Buffy reiterated it
in Selfless: “in the end the Slayer
is always cut off. There's no mystical guidebook. No all-knowing council. Human
rules don't apply. There's only me. I am the law.”
So what Giles says may seem harsh, and Xander
calls him on it, but it’s logically inescapable.
Thus, it’s in response to Giles’s statement
that Buffy delivers her speech at the end. That speech, and the events which
follow in the next episode, form the first turning point in the season and you
need to be thinking about its consequences from this point on. Buffy’s
asserting her role as General in a dramatic and forceful way. But of course
Generals are isolated and we know that Buffy feels isolated; in fact, being the
General is precisely what causes her sense of isolation. This is Buffy’s
dilemma, and it’s directly tied to both of the other concerns she’s expressed
in previous episodes, namely that she’s isolated and that she can’t save them
all.
Given the First’s all out war on the Council
and Buffy’s call to war in turn, I thought it would be interesting to quote DEN
on the similarity to old war movies:
“The "war" metaphor is shaping s7
to the point where BOTN resembles those old WWI movies like "Wings"
and "Dawn Patrol." Willow is the veteran with too many combat hours,
muttering "sorry I let you down, old boy" as her shaking hands try to
hold a scotch and soda. Xander is the cockney gunner, keeping his sense of
humor as things unravel. Anya is the squadron American, the volunteer from far
away, never quite understanding the people she fights alongside. In Giles we
have the wise and experienced adjudant, prohibited by age and wounds from
climbing into a cockpit. The SiTs are the green lieutenants, doomed to early
and horrible deaths--certainly doomed if, like Annabella, they panic and break
formation. And there's Buffy, coming on like Errol Flynn or Richard
Barthelmess. ‘Chaps, I know it's hell up there. Von Richthofen's flying circus
is tearing us to pieces. We're outnumbered and outgunned. But the lads in the
trenches are counting on us, and the squadron will do its duty to the last
man!’"
No matter how many times I watch Buffy’s
speech, I get chills. Not just the words but SMG’s delivery, both just suck you
in. If you really love the speech, though, ask yourself just how Buffy’s going
to “kill” an incorporeal being, particularly in light of “Joyce’s” obviously
true statements.
Trivia notes: (1) The chronology of this
episode is impossible to square with the date stamp at the beginning of CWDP. (2) Yes, we saw “Joyce” touch
things, even though the First shouldn’t be able to. That’s because Buffy is
dreaming of her. As in all dreams, the ordinary rules don’t apply. (3) Xander
mentioned the mummy hand while repairing the windows, which was from Life Serial. (4) Xander’s description of
Andrew as “Sleeping Ugly” is, of course, a reference to Sleeping Beauty. (5)
Dawn suggested that Andrew was in a “fugue state”, which is “a rare psychiatric
disorder characterized by reversible amnesia for personal identity, including
the memories, personality and other identifying characteristics of
individuality.” (6) Dawn mentioned that “kids of today like Jackass”, which was a movie. Of sorts.
(7) The scene of Spike held under water was originally supposed to be Holy
Water, but the Standards & Practices folks (a euphemism for censors) nixed
that. As a result, the scene doesn’t make any sense because vampires don’t
breathe and so holding them underwater is pointless. (8) Kennedy apologized for
“the British
invasion” in Buffy’s kitchen, which refers to the numerous British music groups
which followed The Beatles to America. (9) The Turok-han name was an obvious
homage to Lord of the Rings. (10)
Camden Toy, who played Gnarl and one of the Gentlemen, plays the Ubervamp. (11)
Principal Wood mentioned the movies of Rob Schneider, for whom see the
link. Describing his movies as “evil” is a joke. (12) Principal Wood told Buffy
that “I'm only saying that once you see true evil, it can have some serious
afterburn, and then you can't unsee what you saw. Ever.” “Afterburn” is a term from
psychotherapy which means "the period of time before a past event is
assimilated". Note that his words
apply to Buffy seeing the First in Amends. (13) Xander’s suggestion to trap the Ubervamp
in the pantry is a reference to the movie Signs
by M. Night Shyamalan. (14) Andrew’s “spider sense” is a reference to
Spiderman. (15) For Andrew’s mention of various “super-villain[s] like Dr. Doom or Apocalypse or-or The Riddler”, see the links. (16) To get really obvious,
the scene with Buffy and the Ubervamp in the factory is an homage to The Terminator.
I never quibbled with Buffy's line of thought over the order of Slayerhood, even though you are right it goes through Faith now. Regardless of whether it makes sense for Buffy to center herself, The First'd take Faith out before Buffy to make sure no new Slayer was Chosen before killing Buffy, ending the Slayer line for good.
ReplyDeleteBuffy's speech is chilling and poignant, but wow it really does set the stage for all of the stuff that goes wrong this season(and beyond).
COMIC SPOILERS
Buffy's fault in Season 8 is that, even though she shared her power, she never disbanded the army. She maintained the role of General, even though it was isolating, which of course, leads to the troubles of that season. To me, her sharing the power was to represent dismantling
the patriarchy, and that by keeping the militaristic stance of the Slayers was more of a "using the masters tools" thing, where she kept a hierarchy in the Slayers, instead of a sisterhood.
Re your spoiler point: yes, exactly.
DeleteCOMIC SPOILERS Cont'd,
ReplyDeleteThat was actually one of the big problems I had with the S8 comics. The TV show spent so much time (and did such a good job) of leading Buffy up to that realization about sharing and, without hammering the point too much, providing an alternative to patriarchal norms. Then the comic sort of went back to the old, "I'm with you, but I'm alone" theme. The season had other, bigger problems, to be sure, but that one disappointed me more than most.
Agreed on all counts.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteSorry, I deleted Aeryl's comment because it needed a spoiler tag. Here it is with one:
DeleteSPOILERS FOR S7 and 8
The season would have been better off if it had taken the time to explain WHY things ended up that way.
Like maybe Buffy, after so long as the sole Slayer, checked out of the decision making until after the choice had been made to maintain the army and put Buffy at the head of it, and she felt no choice but to lead.
Anything that would have shown why Buffy didn't grow as the show showed she had.
Of course without these characters growing as we'd like them to, there would be no story. What would the conflict have been, had Buffy disbanded the Slayer army and set up small squads of one to two Slayers with one Watcher between patrolling major cities all over the world?
I think Season 8 works really well, if you look at it as the Show=Feminist Empowerment, and the Comics=Feminist Backlash, but to tell that story, the empowerment can't be all hunky dory.
SPOILERS FOR S7 & 8, cont'd
DeleteThe idea of exploring feminist backlash is an interesting one and a lot could be done with it. A huge part of Buffy's decision at the end of S7 was to endow these girls with a power/gift/responsibility that they hadn't asked for. Granted, it was latent in them by being Potentials, but they might have gone through all their lives as Potentials with no real calling had Buffy (and Willow) not acted as they did. There's an awesome parallel there with Buffy of S1 ("Giles, I'm only 16. I don't wanna die.") And I guess a lot could have been done with Buffy confronting herself over that decision, being confronted by the other Slayers, etc.
I wouldn't be one to suggest alternative plotlines or narrative arcs, but I guess I'd like to have seen the backlash handled on a more personal (and, frankly, less whacky) level than on the global "we must stop this army of women" level that they went for, which forced Buffy (the character) into the box of having to rehash all that leadership stuff.
I've heard S9 gets smaller again, but I haven't gone down that road yet. Maybe when it's all out and I can read it in a big weekend bender . . .